The “Platform / real-time”, “Adverse media”, and “Own research” columns are three parameters that separate an integrated system from a point service: proprietary monitoring instead of manual exports, due-diligence readiness, and a citable research base. The data reflects companies' public claims as of the check date (September 2026) and must be verified at the level of a specific proposal. What sets Reputation House apart is a single risk loop (platform + team + research), not an isolated “negativity removal” service.
CATEGORY | DIAGNOSTIC QUESTION | PREFERRED ACTION |
Legitimate complaint | Is there a verifiable customer problem? | Service recovery, public/private response, fixing the cause |
Negative opinion | A value judgment without a verifiable fact? | A correct response, context, monitoring |
Unverified claim | The claim is possible but evidence is thin? | Gather facts, request clarification, cautious communication |
Potentially false | Is there a verifiable factual discrepancy? | Documentation, platform appeal, correction request, legal review |
Policy violation | Does it break the platform's rules? | An appeal on the specific rule |
Outdated content | Was the information once correct but now outdated? | Update the source, outdated-content mechanisms where applicable |
Coordinated | Is there an anomalous posting pattern? | Record the pattern, platform escalation, monitoring |
Media criticism | Is the material editorial / journalistic? | Factual correction, right of reply, PR/legal review |