A High-Risk Brand Under Constant Reputational Pressure — negative in branded search cut from ~35% to ~5%
Sector: Fintech (online trading) ·
Crisis type: Ongoing (permanent) pressure ·
Status: Under continuous control
The situation: In high-risk sectors like fintech, negative isn't a single event — it's constant. The platform faced a steady stream of negative reviews, complaints, and hostile content, punctuated by sharp spikes like a coordinated wave of negative YouTube videos. Left unmanaged, this perpetual negative costs sign-ups and draws regulatory attention.
What we did: Continuous real-time monitoring across search, YouTube, social, and review platforms; suppression of negative in search and video results; a steady flow of accurate, positive content; and rapid response to every spike before it spreads.
Results:
- Share of negative in branded search reduced from ~35% to ~5% over the first 6 months.
- Average negative spike contained within ~5 hours of detection.
- ~8–10 coordinated spikes detected and neutralized per quarter.
- Review rating recovered from ~3.4 to ~4.3 across major platforms.
Business outcome: Branded search and key review platforms stay majority-positive, protecting sign-up conversion and keeping regulatory scrutiny from escalating.
The lesson: in high-risk sectors, reputation isn't a project with an end date — it's a control function. The brands that stay safe treat monitoring and rapid spike-response as always-on, not as a one-time clean-up.
A Sudden Information Attack — Contained Within ~5 Days
Sector: Undisclosed (NDA)
Crisis type: Sudden (one-off) information attack
Status: Resolved
The situation: A coordinated information attack hit with no warning — likely competitor-driven, though the source is rarely clear at first. The intent was obvious: a deliberate hit, built to spread, and attacks like this typically arrive in two waves.
What we did: We engaged from day one. Before reacting, we ran a deep analysis to gauge the real scale and spread, then counter-responded carefully — never amplifying the story or triggering a bigger collapse — and managed the brand through both waves. Once it subsided, we rebuilt search presence and restored an accurate picture.
Results:
- Attack contained within ~5 days of engagement.
- ~80% of hostile items pushed off page one of branded search.
- Second-wave reach cut by roughly half versus the first wave.
- Branded search restored to baseline within ~3 weeks.
Business outcome: Contained before it reached customers, partners, or press at scale — protecting active deals and the brand's standing during the attack.
The lesson: the first move in a sudden attack should be analysis, not reaction. Understanding scale and source before responding is what keeps a deliberate hit from becoming a self-inflicted collapse.
A Coordinated Negative-Video Campaign Was Dominating a Brand's Search — 82% of YouTube TOP-10 turned positive
Sector: Real Estate (MENA) ·
Crisis type: Coordinated negative-video campaign ·
Status: Resolved
The situation: Ahead of a major launch, a wave of hostile videos was dominating the brand's YouTube and Google results — 97 negative videos, several ranking in the TOP-10 — shaping what buyers and partners saw first.
What we did: Real-time mention monitoring, a steady flow of authoritative brand content, and search-result suppression of the hostile videos across YouTube and Google.
Results:
- 82% of the brand's YouTube TOP-10 results now show positive content.
- 67% of the 97 negative videos suppressed in search.
- 80+ positive responses and discussions published.
Business outcome: Brand search cleared ahead of the launch, restoring buyer and partner confidence.
The lesson: when hostile video dominates branded search, suppression alone isn't enough — you have to flood the same results with authoritative positive content before a key moment like a launch.