Business means money, and reputation is the ultimate currency. A single miscalculation can overturn years of trust and success. Not even industry titans are immune to this costly error that stokes backlash and stains their brand. When businesses ignore societal or ethical responsibilities to make profits, they end up paying for it. Picture an ad campaign that backfires so badly that it becomes a laughingstock—and that’s not nearly the worst-case scenario. Here are 9 notorious examples of reputation failure by major brands and what we can learn from them.
Benetton: The Danger of Overstepping Boundaries

In an attempt to tackle the issue of hate, Benetton released a series of images of global leaders—including the Pope—kissing their adversaries.
- What Went Wrong: Cries of disrespect and exploitation of sacred topics were heard from religious communities who were infuriated by the provocative imagery.
- The Fallout: The campaign brought a lot of public attention to an important issue, but seemed to result in widespread public condemnation and a serious tarnishing of the brand’s reputation.
- Key Takeaway: Provocative campaigns must above all respect cultural and religious sensibilities. Controversy for the sake of attention often backfires.
Pepsi: Oversimplifying Complex Issues

Pepsi’s Kendall Jenner ad had her bridging the gap between protesters and police by just handing out a can of soda.
- What Went Wrong: It trivialized real-world protests and social struggles and was accused of being tone-deaf.
- The Fallout: Because of the backlash, the company suffered reputational and financial loss in being forced to withdraw the ad.
- Key Takeaway: Marketing efforts involving social or political issues demand deep understanding and nuance to avoid exploitation or missteps.
H&M: The Perils of Poor Judgment

H&M displayed an image of a black child wearing a hoodie with the phrase “Coolest Monkey in the Jungle,” igniting a firestorm of criticism.
- What Went Wrong: The ad was interpreted as perpetuating racial stereotypes, causing outrage among consumers.
- The Fallout: The brand faced boycotts and protests, prompting a public apology and internal reviews.
- Key Takeaway: Sensitivity to racial and cultural issues is non-negotiable, as we clearly saw here.
Gillette: A Bold Statement Misinterpreted

Gillette’s “The Best Men Can Be” campaign addressed toxic masculinity and encouraged positive change.
- What Went Wrong: While some applauded the message, others viewed it as a moralizing attack on traditional masculinity.
- The Fallout: The divisive ad led to boycotts and heated debates, resulting in temporary sales dips.
- Key Takeaway: Tackling societal issues is risky. Brands should anticipate diverse responses and craft messages that foster inclusivity rather than division.
Volkswagen: The Cost of Deception

Volkswagen promoted its diesel cars as eco-friendly, but investigations discovered that they had been manipulating the emission's data.
- What Went Wrong: They deliberately deceived regulators and consumers in order to undermine trust.
- The Fallout: Volkswagen took a massive loss of credibility, faced hefty fines, and was sued.
- Key Takeaway: Transparency is vital. Deceiving stakeholders can lead to irreparable damage.
McDonald’s: Crossing Emotional Lines

A McDonald’s UK ad centered on a boy recalling his deceased father over a meal, sparking accusations of emotional exploitation.
- What Went Wrong: Using grief to promote fast food struck many as tasteless (no pun intended) and opportunistic.
- The Fallout: Swift backlash forced the ad’s removal, forcing McDonald’s to try and rebuild trust.
- Key Takeaway: Themes like loss and grief demand delicate handling. Exploiting such emotions for profit is unacceptable.
Burger King: When Jokes Backfire

Burger King tweeted on International Women’s Day, “Women belong in the kitchen” to call attention to its scholarship program for female chefs.
- What Went Wrong: Many took it to be sexist, despite it being an attempt at irony.
- The Fallout: Burger King had to delete the tweet and scramble to clarify their meaning.
- Key Takeaway: Marketing humor should also be aware of cultural context and shouldn't promote harmful stereotypes.
Hyundai: Misjudging Serious Issues

Hyundai released an ad depicting a failed suicide attempt, highlighting its vehicle’s eco-friendly technology.
- What Went Wrong: The campaign trivialized mental health struggles, causing shock and outrage.
- The Fallout: The ad was pulled amid widespread condemnation, damaging the brand’s reputation.
- Key Takeaway: Mental health themes require utmost sensitivity. Insensitive portrayals can alienate audiences.
PETA: Misguided Comparisons

PETA went after the livestock industry in a controversial campaign that equated the conditions on farms with the Holocaust.
- What Went Wrong: Public outrage followed the comparison that was viewed as inappropriate and offensive.
- The Fallout: Obviously, PETA’s reputation was harmed by the backlash.
- Key Takeaway: Historical tragedies should never be trivialized. Misguided analogies can irreversibly damage credibility.
Each of these examples underscores a common truth: reputation is fragile. In these days of instant accountability, one bad campaign can overturn years of goodwill. The keywords here are sensitivity, honesty, knowledge of your audience, all in the pursuit of protecting your brand’s image.